Throughout the existence of leadership, the members developed mechanisms to maximize any leadership potential in their organizations efficiently. The mechanisms differ from one generation to another, thus creating perpetual companies that last during lifetimes.
What are the differences between traditional and modern leadership?
The differences between the traditional and modern techniques of leadership cultivation in an organization include;
-
Modes of encouraging employees to become productive
In the traditional setting, the leaders utilized various means to produce efficiency from their employees; such as punishments and threats. This method enabled several organizations to employ and terminate employees based on what the leaders thought was best. However, modern techniques encourage employees to withhold practices that yield fairness and equality.
-
Treatment of the individuals that seating at the top of the leadership hierarchy
Modern leaders like Richard Warke Vancouver and Larry Page promote the ideology that all participants in the organization are equal regardless of their status in the company. Thus, the subordinate staff is more productive and respectful to each other regardless of their positions. However, the traditional form of leadership ensured that parties who were in leadership were better than others. The higher a person was, the more benefits and rewards, and the lower leadership positions the employees did not receive any acknowledgment.
-
The process of decision making in the organization
The traditional forms of leadership only allowed the top leaders to make decisions without consulting the members even though they affect them. The top leaders made the decisions and expected everyone to abide by them even if it was impossible. In the modern methods of decision making, the leaders should involve the members in some of the decisions it makes. If it is not possible to involve the employees in the decision-making, then the leaders ought to inform the employees of the implications the decision might have on them. The leaders should also issue the employee with an option to accept or deny those implications.
-
Methods in which the leaders exercise their control over the organizations
Several traditional leaders utilized mechanisms such as regulations and unexpected boundaries to rule the company. The method brought about fear from its employees rather than respect and loyalty, which diminished the amount of confidence that the employees had, thus reducing productivity.
The modern mechanisms of cultivating leadership are based on natural justice values, including equality, integrity, and transparency. Richard Warke Vancouver is an ideal example. There are also a set of legislations that govern each jurisdiction, thus making the organizations aware of their roles and the importance of cultivating employee relationships.
In the End
It is also crucial to note that the traditional modes of leadership ran during the industrial revolution until the 20th century; thus, these methods were not wrong. However, they did not develop traits and talents of employees as it was mostly run on fear and the desire to be in the upper class. As time goes on, there is the development of other leadership roles, thus altering each generation.
